Bunker-of-the-Dead-2015-1.jpg' alt='Watch Dead Meat Online' title='Watch Dead Meat Online' />Is Meat Sustainable Worldwatch Institute. Now, Its Not PersonalNow, Its Not Personal But like it or not, meateating is becoming a problem for everyone on the planet. Ask people where theyd rank meateating as an issue of. Watch English Movies for Free latest Hollywood movies Watch English movies online. Latest English movies 2016, trailers of various genres like action, comedy. William OLeary, Actor Bull Durham. William OLeary was born on October 19, 1957 in Chicago, Illinois, USA. He is an actor, known for Bull Durham 1988, Home. NOT vegetarian. Guinness, parmesan cheese, gummy bears, marshmallows, tortillas, and more. Get todays top entertainment news, TV shows, episode recaps, and new movie reviews with pictures and videos of top celebs from Us Weekly. E Online Your source for entertainment news, celebrities, celeb news, and celebrity gossip. Check out the hottest fashion, photos, movies and TV shows The video the meat industry doesnt want you to see. But like it or not, meat eating is becoming a problem for everyone on the planet. Ask people where theyd rank meat eating as an issue of concern to the general public, and most might be surprised to hear you suggest that its an issue at all. Whether you eat meat or not or how much is a private matter, they might say. Maybe it has some implications for your heart, especially if youre overweight. But its not one of the high profile public issues youd expect presidential candidates or senators to be debatingnot up there with terrorism, the economy, the war, or the environment. Even if youre one of the few who recognize meateating as having significant environmental implications, those implications may seem relatively small. Yes, there have been those reports of tropical forest being cut down to accommodate cattle ranchers, and native grassland being destroyed by grazing. But at least until recently, few environmentalists have suggested that meat eating belongs on the same scale of importance as the kinds of issues that have energized Amazon Watch, or Conservation International, or Greenpeace. Yet, as environmental science has advanced, it has become apparent that the human appetite for animal flesh is a driving force behind virtually every major category of environmental damage now threatening the human futuredeforestation, erosion, fresh water scarcity, air and water pollution, climate change, biodiversity loss, social injustice, the destabilization of communities, and the spread of disease. How did such a seemingly small matter of individual consumption move so rapidly from the margins of discussion about sustainability to the center To begin with, per capita meat consumption has more than doubled in the past half century, even as global population has continued to increase. As a result, the overall demand for meat has increased five fold. That, in turn, has put escalating pressure on the availability of water, land, feed, fertilizer, fuel, waste disposal capacity, and most of the other limited resources of the planet. To provide an overview of just how central a challenge this once marginal issue has become, we decided to survey the relevance of meat eating to each of the major categories of environmental impact that have conventionally been regarded as critical to the sustainability of civilization. A brief summary observation for each category is accompanied by quotes from a range of prominent observers, some of whom offer suggestions about how this difficult subjectnot everyone who likes pork chops or ribs is going to switch to tofu without a fightcan be addressed. Deforestation was the first major type of environmental damage caused by the rise of civilization. Large swaths of forest were cleared for agriculture, which included domestication of both edible plants and animals. Farm animals take much more land than crops do to produce a given amount of food energy, but that didnt really matter over the 1. In 1. 99. 0, however, the World Hunger Program at Brown University calculated that recent world harvests, if equitably distributed with no diversion of grain to feeding livestock, could provide a vegetarian diet to 6 billion people, whereas a meat rich diet like that of people in the wealthier nations could support only 2. In other words, with a present population over 6 billion, that would mean we are already into deficit consumption of land, with the deficit being made up by hauling more fish from the oceans, which are in turn being rapidly fished out. In the near term, the only way to feed all the worlds people, if we continue to eat meat at the same rate or if the population continues to grow as projected, is to clear more forest. From now on, the question of whether we get our protein from animals or plants has direct implications for how much more of the worlds remaining forest we have to raze. In Central America, 4. U. S. beef burgers. Meat is too expensive for the poor in these beef exporting countries, yet in some cases cattle have ousted highly productive traditional agriculture. John Revington in World Rainforest Report. The Center for International Forestry Research reports that rapid growth in the sales of Brazilian beef has led to accelerated destruction of the Amazon rainforest. In a nutshell, cattle ranchers are making mincemeat out of Brazils Amazon rainforests, says the Centers director general, David Kaimowitz. Environmental News Service. Grassland destruction followed, as herds of domesticated animals were expanded and the environments on which wild animals such as bison and antelope had thrived were trampled and replanted with monoculture grass for large scale cattle grazing. In a review of Richard Mannings 1. Grassland The History, Biology, Politics, and Promise of the American Prairie, Pulitzer Prize winning writer James Risser observes Many experience anguish at the wreckage of clear cut mixed tree forest, destined to be replaced by a single species tree farm. Few realize, says Manning, that a waving field of golden wheat is the same thing a crop monoculture inhabiting what once was a rich and diverse but now clear cut grassland. Grassland covers more land area than any other ecosystem in North America no other system has suffered such a massive loss of life. Richard Manning in Grassland. Another solution to grassland depletion in Africa would be a shift from cattle grazing toward game ranching. Antelopes, unlike cattle, are adapted to semi arid lands. They do not need to trek daily to waterholes and so cause less trampling and soil compaction. Antelope dung comes in the form of small, dry pellets, which retain their nitrogen and efficiently fertilize the soil. FR-EE Gracie Full Movie here. Cows, in contrast, produce large, flat, wet droppings, which heat up and quickly lose much of their nitrogen in the form of ammonia to the atmosphere. An experimental game ranch in Kenya has been a great economic success while simultaneously restoring the range. Paul R. Ehrlich, Anne H. Ehrlich, and Gretchen C. Daily in The Stork The Plow. Fresh water, like land, seemed inexhaustible for most of the first 1. So, it didnt seem to matter how much a cow drank. But a few years ago, water experts calculated that we humans are now taking half the available fresh water on the planetleaving the other half to be divided among a million or more species. Since we depend on many of those species for our own survival they provide all the food we eat and oxygen we breathe, among other services, that hogging of water poses a dilemma. If we break it down, species by species, we find that the heaviest water use is by the animals we raise for meat. Watch The Horse Dancer Online there. One of the easiest ways to reduce demand for water is to reduce the amount of meat we eat. The standard diet of a person in the United States requires 4,2. Watch War Wolves Streaming more. A person on a vegan diet requires only 3. Richard H. Schwartz in Judaism and Vegetarianism. A report from the International Water Management Institute, noting that 8. The report notes that it takes 5. UN Commission on Sustainable Development, WaterMore Nutrition Per Drop, 2. Lets say you take a shower every dayand your showers average seven minutesand the flow rate through your shower head is 2 gallons per minute. You would use, at that rate, 5,1. When you compare that figure, 5,1. Water Education Foundation calculates is used in the production of every pound of California beef 2,4. In California today, you may save more water by not eating a pound of beef than you would by not showering for six entire months. John Robbins in The Food Revolution How Your Diet Can Help Save Your Life and the World. Waste disposal, like water supply, seemed to have no practical limitations. There were always new places to dump, and for centuries most of what was dumped either conveniently decomposed or disappeared from sight. Just as you didnt worry about how much water a cow drank, you didnt worry about how much it excreted.